CENTRAL PROBLEMS OF AN ECONOMY  Chapter13

Economics is about how people make decisions given their limited resources. The decisions are taken with regard to the basic economic activities such as production and consumption of goods and services and saving and investment. However, taking decision is not easy or simple. One must estimate the wants and the availability of resources while taking decisions on production of goods and services. Similarly distribution of the produced goods in the society needs to be done properly. The basic problems central to any economy, therefore, relate to production, consumption and distribution.

OBJECTIVES

After seen this video, you will be able to:

  • explain the causes of economic problems;
  • identify the central problems: ‘what to produce’, ‘how to produce’ and ‘for whom to produce’;
  • understand the concept of production possibility frontier curve;
  • explain the concepts of opportunity cost and marginal opportunity cost
  • describe the central problems of an economy by using the production possibility curve.

WHY DO ECONOMIC PROBLEMS ARISE

The economic problem arises in every economy due to

(a) Unlimited wants – Human beings are required to satisfy their basic needs for their survival. For example, a person needs food, water, clothing and shelter in order to survive. These are the basic needs of a person. However, no person would like to satisfy only his/her basic needs if he/she could improve his/her life. People, by nature, want more than what they just need for survival. If one want is satisfied, many others crop up and this goes on endlessly

(b) Limited resources – Let us say that all the things said above are available at some price. Now suppose that Neha has only ` 1000 with her to spend. Let food is available at ` 150, a blouse costs ` 200, value of utensil is ` 600, a packet of sweet costs ` 200 and a set of bangles is available at ` 50. All these taken together would cost Neha ` 1200. Since she has only ` 1000 with her, Neha has to adjust her purchases accordingly. Here, we say that the means to satisfy Neha’s wants are limited to ` 1000. People may have high or low income but not unlimited inco. H meence, resources (or income) available to consumers are scarce or limited.

(c) Alternative uses of resources – The above example also highlights another important fact that a resource can be used in different ways. In Neha’s case, she can use her ` 1000 to buy some items. Once she chooses to buy something (for example utensil for her mother) then she can not satisfy her other wants. Similarly, all factors of production can be put to alternative uses. For example, a piece of land can be used to do farming, build a factory, develop a school or build a hospital. A labour can be used to plough a field, to make baskets or to sell vegetables. Hence, we see that resources have alternative uses.

CENTRAL PROBLEMS OF AN ECONOMY Chapter13

From the above discussion we can see that wants are unlimited but resources (to satisfy the wants) are limited which happens to be the basic economic problem faced by all economies. We have also discussed that resources have alternative uses. This basic problem exists in every economy – whether rich or poor; developed or developing.

Suppose resources were not limited. Would it still lead to the economic problem? The answer to this question is that if resources were not scarce they could be used to satisfy all wants. Hence, the basic problem of scarcity and choice would not arise. Scarcity of resources results in people making decisions about how best they would like to use these limited resources. Making the best use of resources is termed as economizing of resources. Economizing of resources does not mean being miserly about using resources, but using resources judiciously so that maximum benefit can be obtained from the scarce resources.

CENTRAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMY

As we have discussed above, every economy in the world faces the economic problem of unlimited wants and limited resources. This economic problem gives rise to people making choices about how they would like to use scarce resources. This economic problem gives rise to the central problems of an economy which are as following

Collectively, these central problems are called the Problem of Allocation of Resources.

(a) What to produce and in what quantities?

The fact that resources are scarce leads to the problem of ‘what to produce’ and in what quantities to produce. An individual producer needs to decide on how to employ the sources that are available to her for production. For example, if Lata, a farmer has a piece of land, she needs to think about what crop she would like to produce on her land. Let us assume taht she can grow either sugarcane or wheat. Given that her land is limited, she needs to choose whether she wants to use the land to produce sugarcane or wheat or both. Once Lata has taken this decision she needs to think about the quantity of the crop that she would like to produce. For example, 10 quintals, 20 quintals or 50 quintals.

The problem of what to produce and in what quantities to be produced can be solved by a government that decides the allocation of resources in different areas of production. Alternatively, it can be solved based on the preferences of people in an economy and on the price of goods and services in market.

(b) How to produce?

Choosing the technique of production relates to the problem of ‘how to produce’. By technique of production we mean the different combination of factors of production that can be used to produce a good.

Generally all goods can be produced through different methods of production. Various methods of production require different combinations of factors of production. A technique of production could be either labour intensive or capital intensive. In a production process when more units of labour are used in proportion to capital, it is termed as a labour intensive technique. Alternatively, when the proportion of capital used is more than labour, the production process is called a capital intensive technique.

The solution of the problem of how to produce is based on the extent of output that is produced for a given level of resources. Any producer would like to maximize the level of output from the available resources. At the same time cost of using a technique is equally very important. A producer will use that particular technology which is available at least cost.

(c) For whom to produce?

The problem of ‘for whom to produce’ relates to how the value of the produced output of an economy gets distributed amongst different people. People do not receive the output they produce as their compensation. The output is sold and the money is earned in the production process. This money is paid as income to people for the work they have done in the production process. This income, in turn, is used by people to satisfy their wants. Hence, the problem of for whom to produce tells us how the different factors of production are compensated for their work.

In our example, once Lata’s crop is harvested and sold,she needs to pay the various factors of production for their services. The labour will be paid wages, land will be paid rent, capital (in the form of machinery) will be paid interest. Lastly, Lata will earn profit as an entrepreneur for organising the factors of production and undertaking some risk of running the produciton activity.

OTHER CENTRAL PROBLEMS OF THE ECONOMY

In addition to the central problems discussed in the previous section, every economy faces two other problems. These are:

(a) Optimum Utilization of Resources- Resources are scarce they must not be wasted. They must also be used judiciously to give the maximum output. Thus, optimum utilization of resources has the following implications:

(i) All resources must be utilized and

(ii) Resources must be used efficiently

These two issues are discussed below:

(i) All resources must be utilized If resources are not utilized/employed or are lying idle, it means that they are being wasted. Wastage of resources results in low output. For example, people may be unemployed. This means that human resources are being wasted. Similarly, when workers in a factory go on strike, capital resources lie idle and are wasted. If these resources are utilized, the output that can be produced in the economy shall rise. Thus, every economy must ensure that scarce resources are utilized and not left idle or unemployed.

(ii) Efficient Utilization of resources – Since resources are scarce, they should not be under utilized. Under utilization of resources means that resources are not being used to their fullest capacity. For example, if a person finds a job in which he works only for 4 hours a day, but his capacity to work is 8 hours a day, then his labour is under utilized. In other words, the person is not being employed efficiently. If he had a job for 8 hours a day, the output would increase. Under utilization of resources also results in wastage of resources. Hence, every economy must try and adopt techniques of production that ensure efficient utilization of resources.

(b) Growth of resources

We have studied earlier in the chapter that wants are unlimited. This means that people continuously want more and more goods. However, these ever increasing wants can not be satisfied unless the resources that produce goods and services are increased. Thus, resources must grow to satisfy the constantly increasing wants in an economy. So, how can resources grow in an economy? Resources can increase if:


(i) There are quantitative changes in the resources – Quantitative increase in resources occurs when the actual quantity of resources that is available in the economy increases. For example, when the population increases, then the quantity of human resource increases. Similarly, when more natural resources are found, it increases the availability of resources in an economy.

(ii) There are qualitative changes in resources – Qualitative changes in human capital occur due to better training and skill development. Qualitative changes in man made capital occur when there is an improvement in technology. Under qualitative changes, the amount of resources available does not change but their productivity increases. Productivity is defined as the output per unit of input. For example, if labour gets trained, then the output from the same person can increase. Productivity improves due to better skill and training.

To conclude our discussion, growth of resources occurs when the physical availability of resources increases and/or there is technological upgradation or an improvement in the quality of resources.

CONCEPT OF PRODUCTION POSSIBILITIES

In deciding ‘what to produce’ and how much, an economy has to take decisions regarding allocation of resources among different possible alternatives. Let us assume that the economy is producing only two commodities, rice and bicycles. With the limitation of the total resources, if all the resources are utilized in the production of rice, let 20 quintals of rice can be produced and no production of bicycle will take place. If more and more resources are being diverted towards the production of bicycles, little amount will be left for the production of rice. Similarly if all the resources are being used in the production of bicycles, say 150 bicycles can be produced and no resources will be left for the production of rice. Therefore, the scarce resources are employed in various combinations to get alternative production possibilities.

The production possibilities curve is a graphical medium of highlighting the central problem of ‘what to produce’. To decide what to produce and in what quantities, it is first necessary to know what is obtainable. The curve shows the options that are obtainable, or simply the production possibilities. What is obtainable is based on the following assumptions:

  • The resources available are fixed
  • The technology remains unchanged.
  • The resources are fully employed
  • The resources are efficiently employed.

PRODUCTION POSSIBILITY SCHEDULE

To simplify, let us assume that only two goods are produced in an economy. Let these two goods be guns and butter. The example given by a famous economist Samuelson who won nobel prize in economics in the year 1969. The example, symbolizes the problem of choice between war goods and civilian goods. Given the extremes and the in-between possibilities, a schedule can be prepared. It can be called a production possibilities schedule. A Production Possibilities Schedule (or Table) is a set of numbers in tabular form that illustrates different possible combinations of two goods that can be produced if all available resources are efficiently used during a given time given technology of production. Suppose if all the resources are engaged in the production of guns, there will be a maximum amount of guns that can be produced per year.

PRODUCTION POSSIBILITIES CURVE/FRONTIER

The central problems of an economy are explained by modern economists with the help of Production Possibility Schedule (PPS) or Production Possibility Curve (PPC). PPS shows alternative production possibilities of two sets of goods with the given resources and techniques of production. PPC is a graphic representation of PPS. It is also called Production Possibility Frontier (PPF). This curve is also called Transformation Curve since it indicates that if more of butter is to be produced, then factors will have to be withdrawn from the production of guns and transferred towards the production of butter.

In Fig. the curve AF is called PPC. As shown in the diagram, when all the resources are used for production of guns only the economy produces 15 units of guns and no butter. This is marked as point A. When some resources are transferred to increase production of butter from 0 to 1 unit, then production of gun fall from 15 to 14 so that the economy reaches at point B on PPC and so on. Finally all resources are transferred from guns to produce only butter, then the economy reaches at point F, where it produces 5 units of butter and no gun. This way the locus ABCDEF gives the PPC. So PPC is a graphical representation of the alternative combinations of the amounts of two goods or services that an economy can produce by transferring resources from one good or service to the other. This curve helps in determining what quantity of a nonessential good or a service an economy can afford to produce without jeopardizing the required production of an essential good or service. PPC has two following properties:

(a) PPC slopes downward: This means that more of a good can be produced only by sacrificing some quantity of the other good.

(b) PPC is concave to the point of origin: You can see that some amount of gun has to be reduced to produce one unit extra of butter. This is done by transferring resources from the produciton of gun to that of butter. The rate at which the units of a good is reduced to increase a unit of another good is called marginal rate of transformation (MRT). MRT is measured along PPC when the economy moves from one point to another.

Hence MRT measures the rate of change of PPC or simply the slope of PPC. On a concave shaped PPC as in Fig. we see that when we increase butter by one unit, we have to decrease gun by more units than before. So on a concave PPC, MRT increases

The curve is based on the following assumptions:

(a) quantity of factors of production is fixed

(b) full employment

(c) technology is given

(d) There are two goods produced in the economy.

UNDERUTILISATION OR INEFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES

We have seen above that any point on the production possibility curve represents full and efficient utilization of resources. If, however, the economy functions at a point inside the production possibility curve, then it shows that there exists either underutilization or inefficient utilization of resources.

Refer to our schedule of PPL given earlier.

Let us understand this point with the help of a diagram given in Fig. 13.2. In Fig. we see that at point G, the economy is producing 2 units of butter and 5 units of guns. Through a re-allocation of resources, the economy can do one of the following:

(a) increase the production of guns to 12 units and keep the production of butter at the same 2 units as at point C on PPC.

(b) increase the production of butter to 4 units and keep the production of guns same at 5 units as shown at point E on PPC.

In both (a) and (b) above, we see that the economy has been able to increase the production of the one of the goods if it moves towards point C or E on PPC from the point G which is inside PPC.

(c) In fact the economy can produce more of both the goods on any point on PPC (e.g. at point D) as compared to point G.

GROWTH OF RESOURCES

We have studied earlier that resources in any economy need to grow to satisfy the ever increasing wants of people. Growth of resources occurs when the physical quantum of resources increases or when there is a rise in the productivity level of resources. This implies that with growth in resources, the output produced in an economy will increase. We can use the diagram in Fig. 13.2 to show growth in produciton capacity.

In Fig. we see that AF is the same production possibility curve as in Fig. As resources grow, the economy can now produce more of both guns and butter. This is depicted by the curve UZ. At point U, the economy produces only guns which has increased to 20 units. This is more than the output of gun at point A. Similarly, at point Z, when the production of gun is zero, the output of butter is 20 units. This is greater than the output of 5 units when resources had not grown. All other output combinations show that the output of both guns and butter are higher on the production possibility curve UZ than on the curve AF. This shows that growth of resources results in an outward shift of the production possibility curve, which results in higher levels of output.